MINIMIZE BAD DEBT EXPENSE
Cash flow is the lifeblood of any business so anything that reduces cash flow could jeopardize business success or even its survival. Any company that extends credit to its customers is at risk of slower or reduced cash flow if any of that credit turns into bad debt expense. Although some level of bad debt expense is often unavoidable, there are steps companies can take to minimize bad debt expense.
When a customer defaults on its bills or is in danger of doing so, the company extending credit to that customer faces a bad debt expense. Bad debt expense reflects the amount of accounts receivable that a company is unable to collect now and may not be able to collect in the future. Because this bad debt expense must be charged against the company's accounts receivable, bad debt expense reduces the amount of accounts receivable on the company’s income statement.
There are many examples of companies dealing with bad debt expense. One company changed its approach to bad debt management after two major clients defaulted on their bills, leaving the company facing tens of thousands of dollars in losses. To make matters worse, the company had also dedicated considerable staff time and resources trying to collect on those bad debts with no success. By purchasing credit insurance, the company not only protected itself against future losses from bad debt, but it also was able to leverage that protection as it pursued growth with new customers.
Unpaid invoices can seriously affect your business by slowing cash flow, reducing inventory turnover, harming credit ratings and even tarnishing your company’s reputation. The longer debts remain outstanding, the harder debt collection can be.
Late payments are an unavoidable fact of business life, using a proper bad debt collection strategy to ensure the prompt collection of unpaid invoices is an essential part of doing business. The key is to find resources to ease the inconvenience of managing and collecting late payments while also speeding up resolutions of these unpaid invoices.
Typically, the allowance method of reporting bad debts expenses is preferred. However, it’s important to know the differences between these two methods and why the allowance method is generally looked to as a means to more accurately balance reports.
When a customer defaults on its bills or is in danger of doing so, the company extending credit to that customer faces a bad debt expense. Bad debt expense reflects the amount of accounts receivable that a company is unable to collect now and may not be able to collect in the future. Because this bad debt expense must be charged against the company's accounts receivable, bad debt expense reduces the amount of accounts receivable on the company’s income statement.
Direct Write-Off:
When reporting bad debts expenses, a company can use the direct write-off method or the allowance method. The direct write-off method reports the bad debt on an organization’s income statement when the non-paying customer’s account is actually written off, sometimes months after the credit transaction took place. Company accountants then create an entry debiting bad debts expense and crediting accounts receivable.
In general, accounting departments do not use the direct write-off method for bad debts expense, as the company’s balance sheet would be likely to report an amount greater than the actual collectable amount and the bad debts expense may be reported in the company’s income statement for the year after the sale. Instead, accountants typically apply the allowance method.
Allowance Method:
Using the allowance method, accountants record adjusting entries at the end of each period based on anticipated losses. At the end of each year, companies review their accounts receivable and estimate what they will not be able to collect. Accountants debit that amount from the company’s bad debts expense and credit it to a contra-asset account known as allowance for doubtful accounts.
When accountants ultimately write off an accounts receivable as uncollectible, they can then debit allowance for doubtful accounts and credit that amount to accounts receivable. Using this method allows the bad debts expense to be recorded closer to the actual transaction time and results in the company’s balance sheet reporting a realistic net amount of accounts receivable.
If bad debt protection does not fit a company’s needs, there are alternatives. The best alternative to bad debt protection is
trade credit insurance, which provides coverage for customer nonpayment in a wide range of circumstances.
The best trade credit insurance also provides credit data and intelligence designed to help companies improve their credit-related decision making and credit management. The goal is to prevent losses from bad debt. Since no company can avoid bad debt entirely, thetrade credit insurance policy
is in place to cover any losses that occur even after the company and the insurer have taken steps to minimize losses.
While bad debt protection only covers “losses from customer insolvency,” trade credit insurance covers “protracted default,” which is when a solvent company is late with its payment or simply fails to pay at all. A large, specialty trade credit insurance carrier can also tailor a policy to cover many other eventualities, including:
Partnering with an organization that specializes in bad debt risk mitigation and collection, like INNSGIMER, is an important first step in recovering commercial debts. Plus, because we provide debt collection services as part of our trade credit insurance offering, we can help you avoid more bad debts before they happen. Contact us today for a chat and to learn how we can help your business.
50+
YEARS EXPERIANCE
200+
BILLION EUROS
15,000+
HAPPY CLIENTS
63
EXPERT TEAMS